Good morning to Captain and crew alike, and welcome to the Admiralty Docket.
Today we answer a client’s question about how admiralty jurisdiction can exist for damage to inland structures through examination of the Admiralty Extension Act and the case of the great Chicago Flood.
Container Ship Charleston Harbor

On April 13, 1992 water from the Chicago River poured nonstop into a freight tunnel running under the river and thence into the buildings in the downtown Chicago Loop. Chicago is a fair sized town and, during the last 100 years, has always been located in the Northern latitudes, so the buildings are constructed with basements. The floodwaters entered the lower levels of so many buildings that the event became known as the “Chicago Flood.”

Garment wholesalers, candy makers, restauranteurs, salesmen, and business persons from all sectors of the economy, filed tort claims in state court against Great Lakes Dredge and Dock for negligent pile driving in the river near the freight tunnel and against the city for negligent maintenance of its freight tunnel. The handsomely paid admiralty lawyers for Great Lakes Dredge and Dock filed a petition in the federal court for limitation of its liability to the value of its tug and its two barges which performed the pile driving. This action depended upon allegations supporting the admiralty jurisdiction of the federal court. 
The pizza distributors, merchants, and bow tie brokers were furious. Their lawyers questioned how claims for damage to merchandise a mile from navigable waters could be covered by admiralty law. They puzzled over a law which would allow Great Lakes to limit its liability for millions of dollars of damage to the combined value of an old tug and two rusty spud barges. On their motion, the district court dismissed the Limitation action for lack of admiralty jurisdiction.
Admiralty attorneys for Great Lakes appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, which found admiralty jurisdiction and reversed the decision of the district court. This decision was based upon the  Extension  of Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, sometimes referred to as the “Admiralty Extension Act”, which invests federal courts with admiralty jurisdiction over all cases where the injury was caused by a ship or other vessel on navigable waters, even if such injury occurred on land.
Furious, the plaintiffs’ lawyers appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but on February 22, 1995, this nation’s highest court sided with Great Lakes and found admiralty jurisdiction over claims caused by negligent pile driving resulting in the Chicago Flood.

Thus, the Admiralty Extension Act extends admiralty jurisdiction, along with its sometimes bewildering remedies and procedures (in this case, the Limitation of Vessel Owners’ Liability Act), to those acts which occur on land but are proximately caused by vessels in navigation.

More next week on the Admiralty Docket. Until then may God Almighty grant you pleasant sailing.

Share →

From our law office in Mount Pleasant, John Hughes Cooper, P.C. handles admiralty law and maritime law cases throughout coastal South Carolina (the Lowcountry), the Pee Dee region, communities surrounding Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie, and elsewhere in the Southeast. The communities we serve include Charleston, Mt. Pleasant, Isle of Palms, Sullivan's Island, Georgetown, Beaufort, Hilton Head, North Myrtle Beach, Myrtle Beach, Edisto Island, Walterboro, Pawley's Island, Murrells Inlet, Little River, Conway, Columbia, Florence, Charleston County, Georgetown County, Berkeley County, Beaufort County, Horry County, Jasper County and Colleton County.

Disclaimer: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

This website uses the Google AdWords remarketing service to advertise on third party websites (including Google) to previous visitors to our site. This could be in the form of an advertisement on the Google search results page, or a site in the Google Display Network. Third-party vendors, including Google, use cookies to serve ads based on someone’s past visits to the John Hughes Cooper, P.C. website. Any data collected will be used in accordance with our own privacy policy and Google’s privacy policy. You can set preferences for how Google advertises to you using the Google Ad Preferences page, and if you want to you can opt out of interest-based advertising entirely by cookie settings or permanently using a browser plugin.